Artist Critique #2

  • Due Jan 8, 2019 by 11:59pm
  • Points 20
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, or a file upload

Skill #1: I can use art vocabulary to critique art.

Skill #3: I understand the use of global themes, symbols, and subject matter in art.

Skill #4: I can analyze images through the process of deconstruction (the components of the image and its meaning).

1. Choose a work to critique that was created by the artist that you most recently researched for the last assignment.

2. Open a new google doc, copy and paste an image of the artwork you are critiquing, and write your critique on the google doc. It should be 4 paragraphs. This LINK Links to an external site. will tell you what information I will be looking for in each of your 4 paragraphs. 

3. When you are finished, click on "Share" and "Get shareable link." Make sure you change "can view" to "can comment" before you copy the link. Then, paste in the submission on canvas.

1547009999 01/08/2019 11:59pm

Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 9 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Critical Response Rubric
Critical Response Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Edit criterion description
Describe
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
4 pts
The artwork, artist, date and media are identified; the vocabulary of the structures (elements) of art effectively and clearly describe the subject matter of the artwork
Edit rating Delete rating
3.2 pts
The artwork and artist are identified, but the use of the vocabulary of the structures (elements) of art ineffectively describe the artwork
Edit rating Delete rating
2.4 pts
A key piece of information is missing
Edit rating Delete rating
0 pts
The description is missing
pts
4 pts
--
Additional Comments
Edit criterion description
Analyze
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
4 pts
Student uses art vocabulary to describe a minimum of 5 examples of the use of elements of art and principles of design within the artwork
Edit rating Delete rating
3.2 pts
Less than 5 examples were described regarding the use of the elements and principles, but the examples were explained clearly using effective vocabulary.
Edit rating Delete rating
2.4 pts
Less than 5 examples were described and the examples given are unclear.
Edit rating Delete rating
0 pts
There are no examples given regarding the use of elements of art or principles of design
pts
4 pts
--
Additional Comments
Edit criterion description
Interpret
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
4 pts
Meaning of the artwork or intent of the artist is clearly discussed; multiple strong points of visual evidence found within the artwork support the interpretation
Edit rating Delete rating
3.2 pts
Meaning of the artwork or intent of the artist is implied; limited or questionable visual evidence found within the artwork support the interpretation
Edit rating Delete rating
2.4 pts
Meaning of the artwork or intent of the artist is not clearly discussed; faulty visual evidence visual evidence or no visual evidence cited to support the interpretation
Edit rating Delete rating
0 pts
Interpretation is missing
pts
4 pts
--
Additional Comments
Edit criterion description
Evaluation
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
4 pts
The effectiveness of the artwork is evaluated; two or more pieces of evidence about the effectiveness are cited; judgment is based on evidence rather than opinion of like or dislike
Edit rating Delete rating
3.2 pts
The effectiveness of the artwork is evaluated; one piece of evidence about the effectiveness is cited; judgment is based on evidence rather than opinion of like or dislike
Edit rating Delete rating
2.4 pts
Evaluation suggests opinion rather than being based upon evidence
Edit rating Delete rating
0 pts
Evaluation is missing
pts
4 pts
--
Additional Comments
Edit criterion description
Grammar
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
4 pts
No grammatical or spelling errors; highly polished and professional; philosophy could be published
Edit rating Delete rating
3.2 pts
5 or less grammatical or spelling errors. Only slight revision necessary.
Edit rating Delete rating
2.4 pts
Multiple errors; requires considerable revision
pts
4 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 20 out of 20