Wilmot Proviso
- Due Jan 4, 2021 by 11:59pm
- Points 20
- Submitting a text entry box
- Available Jan 4, 2021 at 8:30am - Jan 8, 2021 at 2:59pm
8.H.2.1 - Explain the impact of economic, political, social, and military conflicts on the development of North Carolina and the United States.
Congress Debates the Fate of the Nation: Analyzing The Wilmot Proviso & President Polk’s 1848 Map
Directions:
- Read the Article.
- Answer the 4 questions.
U. S. President James Polk requests 2 million dollars to purchase land from Mexico following the Mexican-American War. David Wilmot of Pennsylvania attaches the "Wilmot Proviso" to this bill. It passes in the House but is tabled in the Senate. |
“Provided that as an express and fundamental condition to the acquisition of any territory from the Republic of Mexico, by the United States, by virtue of any treaty which may be negotiated between them, and to the use by the Executive of the monies therein appropriated, neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall (illegible word) exist in any part of said territory except for crime whereof the party shall be first duly convicted.”
The Wilmot Proviso was designed to eliminate slavery within the land acquired as a result of the Mexican War (1846-48). Soon after the war began, President James K. Polk sought the appropriation of $2 million as part of a bill to negotiate the terms of a treaty. Fearing the addition of a pro-slave territory, Pennsylvania Congressman David Wilmot proposed his amendment to the bill. Although the measure was blocked in the southern-dominated Senate, it enflamed the growing controversy over slavery, and its underlying principle helped bring about the formation of the Republican Party in 1854.
The antislavery declaration reflected the national political situation. The Democrats had divided over slavery and expansion during the 1844 election, but after his victory James K. Polk had pushed for the acquisition of the Oregon country and for a larger share of Texas from Mexico.
Northern Democrats such as Wilmot, who feared the addition of slave territory, had resented Polk’s willingness to compromise the Oregon dispute with Great Britain at the forty- ninth parallel-less territory than expected. More interested in northern free labor than in the plight of southern slaves, Wilmot had been an administration loyalist until he presented his proviso. Apparently, it may not even have been his idea. The language was taken from the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, and several antislavery congressmen had written similar measures.
Although the measure was blocked in the southern-dominated Senate, it helped widen the growing sectional rift, and it inspired such politicians of the time as James Buchanan, Lewis Cass, and John C. Calhoun to formulate their own plans for dealing with slavery as the nation expanded its territory.
Questions:
1. What was the Proviso? Amended Clause attached to a Bill, Stated that: "neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall exist in any part of said territory except for crime whereof the party shall be first duly convicted.”
2. Is slavery a moral issue? Yes, Slavery is a Moral issue.
3. To whom is slavery a Moral Issue? Religious teachings say slavery is morally wrong, Abolitionists (People who wanted to Abolish Slavery in the US), & Slaves/freed-slaves would find this to be a moral issue as well.
4. What can we say about David Wilmot? Based on the text we can infer that David Wilmot was an Abolitionist.